A SITE WHERE YOU CAN GET DIVERSE MATERIALS ON EDUCATION, INSPIRATION,RELIGIOUS AND GENERAL LIFE....GET ACADEMIC ARTICLES, THESIS, RESEARCH PAPERS AMONG OTHERS. FULLY RE-LOADED TO BE AT PAR WITH THE NEEDS AND THE DEMANDS OF THE REVOLUTIONIZED EDUCATION IN THE 21ST, CENTURY.

Monday, December 24, 2012

CONTRASTING CHINA AND JAPAN



Contrasting China and Japan
Japan has the longest life expectancy rate in the world with a population of about 126.475 million people while that of China is estimated to be 1.3367 billion people. Japan has an average growth rate of -0.1% while China has 0.5% .China’s population is drastically declining due to such practices as one-child policy and female infanticide. Parents prefer not more than one child in order to save money and to give them ample time to pursue their careers. They generally believe that raising more than one child is expensive.Japan suffers from the same experience. In both countries, the young generation is reducing while the aging population is increasing.Japan does not allow significant immigrants. China has more people migrating to other countries than those coming in.
One of the theories that explain the trend in the population growth is the demographic transition which was propounded by Warren Thompson (1887-1973).He explains the transition that takes place in industrialized societies from high birth rates and death rates to low birth rates and death rates. It is based on fertility rates (which is ever decreasing).
The second theory is the ‘core’ and ‘periphery’. It explains that the improving economy of the world is enjoyed by the wealthy states (core) regardless of their population size. The poorer states (periphery) do not enjoy the improving economy of the world but instead increase their population to cater for the increasing demand for labour.
There have been measures in China aimed at reducing the high growth rate. Some of these measures include implementation of one-child policy which began in 1979.However; this is just a temporary measure to help slow down the population growth and therefore is likely to be substituted by other measures. Any couple breaking this law is fined. The aim of China is to reduce the population within the next three hundred years to a population of 300 to 500 million people. On the contrary, Japan doesn’t lay much emphasis on reducing the population. It has an enormous aging population; therefore the government encourages Japanese families to have children. It has started support a child allowance given to the fathers or mothers who live in Japan and take care of children aged 15 years or younger until they graduate from high school.  
Using the “rule of 69”, the exact doubling time for the population in China and Japan is calculated as:     FP=PP.(1+r)T, where FP is future population, PP=present population = population growth rate and T= exact doubling time. Therefore,            Description: T = \frac{ln(2)}{ln(1+r)}
CHINA
It has a population of 1.3367 billion people, the growth rate is 0.5%, therefore time taken to double will be

Description: T = \frac{ln(2)}{ln(1+r)}              = 0.69315 ÷ ln (1+0.005)
                       =0.69315 ÷ 0.004988         = 138.98 years.
Meaning that it will take 138.98 years for the current China’s population to double.
JAPAN
It has a population of 126.475 million people, with a growth rate of -0.1%, therefore the time taken to double will be;                   Description: T = \frac{ln(2)}{ln(1+r)}
                                                                             = 0.69315 ÷   ln (1-0.001)
                                                                            =0.69315 ÷ (-0.00100              = -692.8 years.

This shows that Japan’s population will reduce by half within an estimate of 692.8 years. Japanese population is not expected to double but reduce.



REFERENCES
 Arnold, F., & Zhaoxiang, L. (1986). Sex preference, fertility, and family planning in China. Population and Development Review, 12(2), 221-246.
Warren Thompson (2003). Encyclopaedia of Population. Macmillan Reference. pp. 939–940.
Caldwell, John C.; Bruce K Caldwell, Pat Caldwell, Peter F McDonald, Thomas Schindlmayr (2006). Demographic Transition Theory. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. pp. 41

No comments:

Post a Comment