Bettelheim
Bruno’s background to his work
Bruno
Bettelheim, born in 1903, is a recognized psychologist who helped treat
psychologically affected children when others could not manage. At the age of
14, he met Freud. He also interacted with Ann Freud at an early age. This
significantly helped him to develop interest in studying the behavior of children.
Mostly he was interested in autism. Ann Freud brought him a girl who suffered
from psychological disorders and he struggled to treat her. Bruno was later arrested
by the Nazis and taken to court. This did not hinder him from pursuing his ambitions.
He could constantly examine his life, that of his fellow prisoners and the guards.
While he was at the prison for seven years, his studies helped him to
understand the behaviors of children. The author understood how psychologically
disturbed children could be treated.
He
continued with the work of assisting the children in recovering from psychosis.
Later he became the director in Orthogenic School in the University of Chicago
and this is where his focus was deeply rooted. His main focus was to assist
psychopaths, sociopaths and others. His work was basically aimed at caring for
the children but later it included the mothers.
The
Importance of Play
Bruno
Bettelheim discusses in his article The
Importance of Play an insightful study on children that attempts to depict
the psychological significance of play upon the growth and development of the
young children’s mind.
Bruno
Bettelheim explains an in-depth significance of play during childhood. His main
contentions are that the children’s play should never be taken for granted. It
should not be assumed that they are young to decide for themselves in terms of
what activity they would like to be involved in and what play they mostly engage
in. While parents and other adults highly determines the kind of play children
are involved in, the author contends that adult is responsible for the process of maturity which starts to develop as soon as the child chooses the kind of play that he/she wants to
engage in (Bruno Bettelheim, p.28). He opposes the parents who normally impose
rules and games that their children play. From his point of view, play is an
activity characterized by personally imposed rules which could be changed at
will.
Though
many parents can view child’ play as merely fantasy, it has gotten an immense
implication in many dimensions including those of the social, cognitive and
emotional. Bruno Bettelheim considers there is a great difference that exists
between playing and playing games. His main argument is the
play does not only refer to movement ‘ones elbows but also one’s mind’ (Bruno
Bettelheim, p.35). The author holds an opinion that the play that leads to a healthy
development is the one where children constantly develop mentally through
‘toying with ideas’ (Bruno Bettelheim p.36). Freud views play as the ‘royal
road’ to the unconscious while Bruno sees play as the ‘royal road’ to
understanding the inner world of children (Bruno Bettelheim, p.36). Generally,
children use play as an avenue to learn and understand the world around them.
What do
children learn or gain from the act of playing?
The
freewill of engaging in fantasy and the absence of any goals outside the
activities that the children engage in express a child’s inner nature which is
a vital aspect in a healthy development. Furthermore, any form of playing
embargo imposed on them may act to reduce their imaginative capacity (Clarke, p.8). For instance, play during childhood is
an important springboard based upon which creativity especially in adulthood. Denial
of free choice of play therefore will create an invisible barrier
(glass-ceiling) towards the vertical mobility of children in creative
activities such as musicians, artists, inventors and others.
Children
normally believe that watching something means touching it. They may be
satisfied by seeing a simple object rather than being satisfied with the
programs they may watch in a television. The unconscious touching of objects by
the children culminates into the learning process as they are able to know near
and far objects which develop later into the knowledge of what can be attained
and what cannot be attained.
According
to Freud, cultural and psychological advancements are achieved through-the play.
For example, a child knows how to express himself/herself. In addition, complex
psychological processes can be solved through the play. Children’s perception
about the world is seen through the play. Although most of the time they may
not understand the meaning of activities they engage in and the fact that they
may not be able to express themselves, the play normally shows their inner
attitudes, problems, desire and anxieties.
Play
to a great extent acts as a way of assimilating the children into the social world.
They can practice being good carpenters, masons, caring mothers or fathers. At
the age of five, the play becomes advanced and the children get involved in
role play where they assume the roles of the people that they admire or those
that they consider as their role models. Relationships at this stage are very
important.
What does
play reveal about a child’s cognitive, social, and emotional development?
A child’s
cognitive development according to Jean Piaget constitutes good bases in the
process of socialization. While being involved in playing games, the child
learns the rules of the game as well as controlling him/herself from domination
to the others.However; self control is not a quick-fix activity. The child will
learn it over a long period of time. Those who try to change the rules of the
game soon find that the game breaks down. That not following the laws will lead
to the creation of social disorder and mayhem. Therefore, they learn how to adhere to the
stipulated rules and regulations.
During the
games that children play, they normally waste a lot of time discussing which game
to play, the group size as well as the general rules of the game (Brown, Mac & Freeman, p.260). Such negotiations might affect
children’s games, thus they have little time to play the game. This makes the
children acquire the ability to reason and to judge what is appropriate or not.
They also learn how consensus is reached, judging what is appropriate and what
is not. If adults therefore refrain from determining the kind of games that the
children should play, then they develop mastery of skills involved in playing
the game and this tends to assist them in critical decision making in the
future.
Children,
therefore learn and internalize cognitive, social and emotional development as
they interact during the games (Clarke,
p.15). These
internalized values and principles are the ones that guide them in solving
problems in the future, good interpersonal relationships, as well as
self-control. This to a greater extent reveals that these factors are nurtured during
the process of growing of an individual.
In a
nutshell, play in a childhood has a far reaching impact not only on the
individual but also on the society. The process of social and cognitive development
in a child is such a critical process that the parents or other caretakers
ought to consider in making certain decisions. Children ought to be left to
make their own decisions pertaining which games they want to play. This is what
contributes to effective development. The games that children normally involve
in should not only be taken for competition purposes but have meanings attached
to them with a lot of implications for a healthy child’s growth.
Works Cited
Bettelheim .B. The importance of play: Games Ain't What They Used to Be. (1993).
New York: Knopf.
Brown, Mac H. and Freeman, N.K. We don’t play that way at
preschool: the moral and
Ethical
dimensions of controlling children’s play in, S. Reifel and Mac H. Brown (Eds)
Early
Education and Care and Reconceptualising Play – Advances in Early Education
and Day Care, Volume II (Oxford, Elsevier Science), 259 – 274. (2001),
Piaget.
Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York, W.W. Norton. (1962)
Goldberg,
Helene. The Creation of Dr. B: A Biography of Bruno Bettelheim. Tikkun 12(5):
77. (1997).
No comments:
Post a Comment